| | | | | | |

Core i7-10870H vs Ryzen 5 3500X


Description
The i7-10870H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 3500X is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10870H gets a score of 487 k points while the 3500X gets 373.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-10870H is 1.3 times faster than the 3500X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0652
870f10
Core
Comet Lake-H
Matisse
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
FC-BGA 1440
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
32768 kB
Date
September 2020
September 2019
Mean monothread perf.
79.2k points
66.61k points
Mean multithread perf.
487.05k points
373.61k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10870H
3500X
Test#1 (Integers)
30.38k
15.48k (x0.51)
Test#2 (FP)
27.95k
22.91k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.51k
7.1k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.37k
21.11k (x1.47)
TOTAL
79.2k
66.61k (x0.84)

Multithread

i7-10870H

3500X
Test#1 (Integers)
216.18k
90.39k (x0.42)
Test#2 (FP)
210.82k
139.1k (x0.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
51.57k
53.2k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.47k
90.92k (x10.74)
TOTAL
487.05k
373.61k (x0.77)

Performance/W
i7-10870H
3500X
Test#1 (Integers)
4804 points/W
1391 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4685 points/W
2140 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1146 points/W
818 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
188 points/W
1399 points/W
TOTAL
10823 points/W
5748 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-10870H
3500X
Test#1 (Integers)
6075 points/GHz
3776 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5589 points/GHz
5588 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1302 points/GHz
1732 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2873 points/GHz
5149 points/GHz
TOTAL
15840 points/GHz
16246 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4