Core i7-10870H vs Ryzen 5 2600X
Description
The i7-10870H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 2600X is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10870H gets a score of 487 k points while the 2600X gets 333.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10870H is 1.5 times faster than the 2600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10870H gets a score of 487 k points while the 2600X gets 333.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10870H is 1.5 times faster than the 2600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0652
800f82
Core
Comet Lake-H
Pinnacle Ridge
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
FC-BGA 1440
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
45 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
September 2020
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
79.2k points
66.44k points
Mean multithread perf.
487.05k points
333.12k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10870H
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
30.38k
15.75k (x0.52)
Test#2 (FP)
27.95k
26.29k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.51k
5.91k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.37k
18.48k (x1.29)
TOTAL
79.2k
66.44k (x0.84)
Multithread
i7-10870H
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
216.18k
94.49k (x0.44)
Test#2 (FP)
210.82k
182.53k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
51.57k
45.95k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.47k
10.15k (x1.2)
TOTAL
487.05k
333.12k (x0.68)
Performance/W
i7-10870H
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
4804 points/W
995 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4685 points/W
1921 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1146 points/W
484 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
188 points/W
107 points/W
TOTAL
10823 points/W
3507 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-10870H
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
6075 points/GHz
3749 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5589 points/GHz
6261 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1302 points/GHz
1408 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2873 points/GHz
4401 points/GHz
TOTAL
15840 points/GHz
15819 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4