| | | | | | |

Core i7-10870H vs i7-1195G7


Description
The i7-10870H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-1195G7 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10870H gets a score of 487 k points while the i7-1195G7 gets 239.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-10870H is 2 times faster than the i7-1195G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0652
806c2
Core
Comet Lake-H
Tiger Lake UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
FC-BGA 1440
BGA 1499
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
45 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
12288 kB
Date
September 2020
May 2021
Mean monothread perf.
79.2k points
82.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
487.05k points
239.58k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-10870H
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
4.77k
4.57k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
19.81k
17.21k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.29k
9.97k (x1.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.03k
14.98k (x1.07)
TOTAL
44.9k
46.75k (x1.04)

Multithread

i7-10870H

i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
31.21k
12.75k (x0.41)
Test#2 (FP)
151.01k
45.98k (x0.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
50.13k
27.86k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.37k
20.06k (x2.4)
TOTAL
240.71k
106.66k (x0.44)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10870H
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
30.38k
30.89k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
27.95k
25.57k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.51k
10.64k (x1.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.37k
15.66k (x1.09)
TOTAL
79.2k
82.77k (x1.05)

Multithread

i7-10870H

i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
216.18k
96.34k (x0.45)
Test#2 (FP)
210.82k
95.75k (x0.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
51.57k
32.29k (x0.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.47k
15.2k (x1.8)
TOTAL
487.05k
239.58k (x0.49)

Performance/W
i7-10870H
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
4804 points/W
3441 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4685 points/W
3420 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1146 points/W
1153 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
188 points/W
543 points/W
TOTAL
10823 points/W
8557 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-10870H
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
6075 points/GHz
6179 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5589 points/GHz
5115 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1302 points/GHz
2128 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2873 points/GHz
3133 points/GHz
TOTAL
15840 points/GHz
16555 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4