| | | | | | |

Core i7-10870H vs i7-11700F


Description
The i7-10870H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-11700F is based on Rocket Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10870H gets a score of 487 k points while the i7-11700F gets 512.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-11700F is 1.1 times faster than the i7-10870H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0652
a0671
Core
Comet Lake-H
Rocket Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
FC-BGA 1440
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
16384 kB
Date
September 2020
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
79.2k points
89.58k points
Mean multithread perf.
487.05k points
512.32k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10870H
i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
30.38k
32.55k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
27.95k
26.95k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.51k
10.76k (x1.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.37k
19.32k (x1.34)
TOTAL
79.2k
89.58k (x1.13)

Multithread

i7-10870H

i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
216.18k
232.06k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
210.82k
203.56k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
51.57k
72.89k (x1.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.47k
3.81k (x0.45)
TOTAL
487.05k
512.32k (x1.05)

Performance/W
i7-10870H
i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
4804 points/W
3570 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4685 points/W
3132 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1146 points/W
1121 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
188 points/W
59 points/W
TOTAL
10823 points/W
7882 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-10870H
i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
6075 points/GHz
6642 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5589 points/GHz
5500 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1302 points/GHz
2196 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2873 points/GHz
3943 points/GHz
TOTAL
15840 points/GHz
18281 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4