| | | | | | |

Core i7-10870H vs i7-1165G7


Description
The i7-10870H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-1165G7 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10870H gets a score of 487 k points while the i7-1165G7 gets 210.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-10870H is 2.3 times faster than the i7-1165G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0652
806c1
Core
Comet Lake-H
Tiger Lake-UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
FC-BGA 1440
BGA 1449
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
45 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
12288 kB
Date
September 2020
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
79.2k points
62.1k points
Mean multithread perf.
487.05k points
210.4k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-10870H
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
4.77k
4.26k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
19.81k
19.54k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.29k
10.95k (x1.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.03k
11.08k (x0.79)
TOTAL
44.9k
45.84k (x1.02)

Multithread

i7-10870H

i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
31.21k
15.69k (x0.5)
Test#2 (FP)
151.01k
68.3k (x0.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
50.13k
33.66k (x0.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.37k
12.16k (x1.45)
TOTAL
240.71k
129.81k (x0.54)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-10870H
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
17.17k
14.48k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
25.26k
24.18k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.7k
11.95k (x1.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.81k
11.01k (x0.8)
TOTAL
62.95k
61.62k (x0.98)

Multithread

i7-10870H

i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
116.68k
50.98k (x0.44)
Test#2 (FP)
187.28k
80.7k (x0.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
51.52k
36.61k (x0.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.39k
12.02k (x1.43)
TOTAL
363.87k
180.32k (x0.5)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-10870H
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
16.14k
16.27k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
24.74k
25.74k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.98k
11.5k (x1.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.7k
10.82k (x0.85)
TOTAL
59.55k
64.32k (x1.08)

Multithread

i7-10870H

i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
117.03k
54k (x0.46)
Test#2 (FP)
199.88k
88.76k (x0.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
50.64k
35.23k (x0.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.23k
12.14k (x1.48)
TOTAL
375.77k
190.12k (x0.51)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10870H
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
30.38k
22.97k (x0.76)
Test#2 (FP)
27.95k
21.61k (x0.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.51k
8.99k (x1.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.37k
8.52k (x0.59)
TOTAL
79.2k
62.1k (x0.78)

Multithread

i7-10870H

i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
216.18k
82.75k (x0.38)
Test#2 (FP)
210.82k
86.58k (x0.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
51.57k
29.34k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.47k
11.72k (x1.38)
TOTAL
487.05k
210.4k (x0.43)

Performance/W
i7-10870H
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
4804 points/W
2955 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4685 points/W
3092 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1146 points/W
1048 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
188 points/W
419 points/W
TOTAL
10823 points/W
7514 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-10870H
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
6075 points/GHz
4887 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5589 points/GHz
4599 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1302 points/GHz
1912 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2873 points/GHz
1813 points/GHz
TOTAL
15840 points/GHz
13212 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4