| | | | | | |

Core i7-10750H vs Xeon E5506


Description
The i7-10750H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the E5506 is based on Nehalem.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10750H gets a score of 207.1 k points while the E5506 gets 90.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-10750H is 2.3 times faster than the E5506 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0652
106a5
Core
Comet Lake-H
Gainestown
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.133 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
2.133 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
6/12
4 /4
TDP
45 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2020
March 2009
Mean monothread perf.
75.67k points
9.97k points
Mean multithread perf.
349.21k points
90.45k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-10750H
E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
4.69k
1.21k (x0.26)
Test#2 (FP)
18.71k
2.75k (x0.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.84k
1.94k (x0.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.95k
0.78k (x0.06)
TOTAL
43.19k
6.68k (x0.15)

Multithread

i7-10750H

E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
18.79k
12.25k (x0.65)
Test#2 (FP)
86.1k
25.55k (x0.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.42k
17.1k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.27k
5.01k (x0.95)
TOTAL
137.58k
59.9k (x0.44)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-10750H
E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
16.63k
4.48k (x0.27)
Test#2 (FP)
24.17k
2.99k (x0.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.38k
1.81k (x0.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.69k
0.69k (x0.05)
TOTAL
60.87k
9.97k (x0.16)

Multithread

i7-10750H

E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
67.07k
41k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
107.95k
28.17k (x0.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.05k
17.4k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.07k
3.88k (x0.76)
TOTAL
207.14k
90.45k (x0.44)

Performance/W
i7-10750H
E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
1490 points/W
513 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2399 points/W
352 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
601 points/W
217 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
113 points/W
48 points/W
TOTAL
4603 points/W
1131 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-10750H
E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
3325 points/GHz
2099 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4834 points/GHz
1404 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1277 points/GHz
847 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2738 points/GHz
325 points/GHz
TOTAL
12174 points/GHz
4675 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4