| | | | | | |

Core i7-10750H vs Xeon E5-2670 v3


Description
The i7-10750H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the E5-2670 v3 is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10750H gets a score of 349.2 k points while the E5-2670 v3 gets 452.9 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 1.3 times faster than the i7-10750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0652
306f2
Core
Comet Lake-H
Haswell-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
6/12
12/24
TDP
45 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
12x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
30720 kB
Date
April 2020
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
75.67k points
36.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
349.21k points
452.9k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-10750H
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
4.69k
3.52k (x0.75)
Test#2 (FP)
18.71k
8.68k (x0.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.84k
2.83k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.95k
3.13k (x0.22)
TOTAL
43.19k
18.17k (x0.42)

Multithread

i7-10750H

E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
18.79k
32.7k (x1.74)
Test#2 (FP)
86.1k
105.18k (x1.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.42k
35.18k (x1.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.27k
9.54k (x1.81)
TOTAL
137.58k
182.59k (x1.33)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-10750H
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
16.63k
11.08k (x0.67)
Test#2 (FP)
24.17k
9.57k (x0.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.38k
3.18k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.69k
3.28k (x0.24)
TOTAL
60.87k
27.11k (x0.45)

Multithread

i7-10750H

E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
67.07k
139.07k (x2.07)
Test#2 (FP)
107.95k
133.47k (x1.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.05k
46.6k (x1.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.07k
6.65k (x1.31)
TOTAL
207.14k
325.78k (x1.57)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-10750H
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
16.71k
11.18k (x0.67)
Test#2 (FP)
25.45k
10.06k (x0.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.06k
3.21k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.2k
3.12k (x0.24)
TOTAL
61.43k
27.57k (x0.45)

Multithread

i7-10750H

E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
67.59k
140.98k (x2.09)
Test#2 (FP)
111.94k
145.37k (x1.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.7k
45.62k (x1.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.3k
6.75k (x1.27)
TOTAL
212.53k
338.73k (x1.59)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10750H
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
29.06k
18.62k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
26.49k
10.49k (x0.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.23k
4.04k (x0.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.89k
3.26k (x0.23)
TOTAL
75.67k
36.41k (x0.48)

Multithread

i7-10750H

E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
154.61k
236.25k (x1.53)
Test#2 (FP)
151.34k
151.05k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.33k
58.9k (x1.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.93k
6.7k (x0.97)
TOTAL
349.21k
452.9k (x1.3)

Performance/W
i7-10750H
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
3436 points/W
1969 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3363 points/W
1259 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
807 points/W
491 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
154 points/W
56 points/W
TOTAL
7760 points/W
3774 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-10750H
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
5811 points/GHz
6006 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5298 points/GHz
3385 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1246 points/GHz
1303 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2778 points/GHz
1052 points/GHz
TOTAL
15133 points/GHz
11745 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4