Core i7-10750H vs Xeon E5-2620 v4
Description
The i7-10750H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the E5-2620 v4 is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10750H gets a score of 349.2 k points while the E5-2620 v4 gets 237.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10750H is 1.5 times faster than the E5-2620 v4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10750H gets a score of 349.2 k points while the E5-2620 v4 gets 237.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10750H is 1.5 times faster than the E5-2620 v4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0652
406f1
Core
Comet Lake-H
Broadwell-EP
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
Socket 2011-3
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
45 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
20480 kB
Date
April 2020
March 2016
Mean monothread perf.
75.67k points
29.39k points
Mean multithread perf.
349.21k points
237.83k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-10750H
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
4.69k
2.6k (x0.56)
Test#2 (FP)
18.71k
7.55k (x0.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.84k
2.61k (x0.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.95k
2.03k (x0.15)
TOTAL
43.19k
14.79k (x0.34)
Multithread
i7-10750H
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
18.79k
17.41k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
86.1k
75.46k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.42k
26.25k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.27k
4.65k (x0.88)
TOTAL
137.58k
123.78k (x0.9)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-10750H
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
16.63k
8.22k (x0.49)
Test#2 (FP)
24.17k
12.06k (x0.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.38k
4.01k (x0.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.69k
2.89k (x0.21)
TOTAL
60.87k
27.18k (x0.45)
Multithread
i7-10750H
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
67.07k
61.34k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
107.95k
90.21k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.05k
26.2k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.07k
4.62k (x0.91)
TOTAL
207.14k
182.37k (x0.88)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-10750H
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
16.71k
6.04k (x0.36)
Test#2 (FP)
25.45k
10.18k (x0.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.06k
2.74k (x0.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.2k
2.41k (x0.18)
TOTAL
61.43k
21.37k (x0.35)
Multithread
i7-10750H
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
67.59k
47.51k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
111.94k
75.12k (x0.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.7k
19.72k (x0.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.3k
5.45k (x1.03)
TOTAL
212.53k
147.8k (x0.7)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10750H
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
29.06k
12.16k (x0.42)
Test#2 (FP)
26.49k
11.82k (x0.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.23k
3.02k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.89k
2.4k (x0.17)
TOTAL
75.67k
29.39k (x0.39)
Multithread
i7-10750H
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
154.61k
103.77k (x0.67)
Test#2 (FP)
151.34k
102.28k (x0.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.33k
26.13k (x0.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.93k
5.65k (x0.82)
TOTAL
349.21k
237.83k (x0.68)
Performance/W
i7-10750H
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
3436 points/W
1221 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3363 points/W
1203 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
807 points/W
307 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
154 points/W
66 points/W
TOTAL
7760 points/W
2798 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-10750H
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
5811 points/GHz
4054 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5298 points/GHz
3939 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1246 points/GHz
1005 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2778 points/GHz
799 points/GHz
TOTAL
15133 points/GHz
9798 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4