Core i7-10750H vs i9-9900K
Description
The i7-10750H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i9-9900K is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10750H gets a score of 349.2 k points while the i9-9900K gets 529.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-9900K is 1.5 times faster than the i7-10750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10750H gets a score of 349.2 k points while the i9-9900K gets 529.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-9900K is 1.5 times faster than the i7-10750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0652
906ed
Core
Comet Lake-H
Coffee Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
45 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
16384 kB
Date
April 2020
October 2018
Mean monothread perf.
75.67k points
81.91k points
Mean multithread perf.
349.21k points
529.32k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-10750H
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
4.69k
5k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
18.71k
20.22k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.84k
6.54k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.95k
13.78k (x0.99)
TOTAL
43.19k
45.53k (x1.05)
Multithread
i7-10750H
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
18.79k
36.39k (x1.94)
Test#2 (FP)
86.1k
166.55k (x1.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.42k
54.92k (x2)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.27k
8.96k (x1.7)
TOTAL
137.58k
266.82k (x1.94)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-10750H
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
16.63k
18.03k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
24.17k
25.98k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.38k
6.86k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.69k
14.5k (x1.06)
TOTAL
60.87k
65.37k (x1.07)
Multithread
i7-10750H
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
67.07k
131.34k (x1.96)
Test#2 (FP)
107.95k
204.76k (x1.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.05k
55.74k (x2.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.07k
8.99k (x1.77)
TOTAL
207.14k
400.83k (x1.94)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-10750H
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
16.71k
17.98k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
25.45k
27.04k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.06k
6.63k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.2k
13.6k (x1.03)
TOTAL
61.43k
65.24k (x1.06)
Multithread
i7-10750H
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
67.59k
130.88k (x1.94)
Test#2 (FP)
111.94k
208.5k (x1.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.7k
54.12k (x1.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.3k
8.91k (x1.68)
TOTAL
212.53k
402.41k (x1.89)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10750H
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
29.06k
32.08k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
26.49k
28.17k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.23k
6.68k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.89k
14.98k (x1.08)
TOTAL
75.67k
81.91k (x1.08)
Multithread
i7-10750H
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
154.61k
242.98k (x1.57)
Test#2 (FP)
151.34k
220.16k (x1.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.33k
53.97k (x1.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.93k
12.22k (x1.76)
TOTAL
349.21k
529.32k (x1.52)
Performance/W
i7-10750H
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
3436 points/W
2558 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3363 points/W
2317 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
807 points/W
568 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
154 points/W
129 points/W
TOTAL
7760 points/W
5572 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-10750H
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
5811 points/GHz
6417 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5298 points/GHz
5634 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1246 points/GHz
1335 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2778 points/GHz
2996 points/GHz
TOTAL
15133 points/GHz
16382 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4