| | | | | | |

Core i7-10750H vs i9-9900K


Description
The i7-10750H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i9-9900K is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10750H gets a score of 349.2 k points while the i9-9900K gets 545.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-9900K is 1.6 times faster than the i7-10750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0652
906ec
Core
Comet Lake-H
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
45 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
16384 kB
Date
April 2020
October 2018
Mean monothread perf.
75.67k points
86.24k points
Mean multithread perf.
349.21k points
545.3k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-10750H
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
4.69k
5.17k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
18.71k
21.15k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.84k
7.01k (x1.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.95k
15.32k (x1.1)
TOTAL
43.19k
48.66k (x1.13)

Multithread

i7-10750H

i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
18.79k
38.45k (x2.05)
Test#2 (FP)
86.1k
155.68k (x1.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.42k
51k (x1.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.27k
18.26k (x3.46)
TOTAL
137.58k
263.38k (x1.91)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10750H
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
29.06k
33.62k (x1.16)
Test#2 (FP)
26.49k
30.02k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.23k
7.17k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.89k
15.43k (x1.11)
TOTAL
75.67k
86.24k (x1.14)

Multithread

i7-10750H

i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
154.61k
248.93k (x1.61)
Test#2 (FP)
151.34k
224.43k (x1.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.33k
53.39k (x1.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.93k
18.54k (x2.68)
TOTAL
349.21k
545.3k (x1.56)

Performance/W
i7-10750H
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
3436 points/W
2620 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3363 points/W
2362 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
807 points/W
562 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
154 points/W
195 points/W
TOTAL
7760 points/W
5740 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-10750H
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
5811 points/GHz
6724 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5298 points/GHz
6003 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1246 points/GHz
1434 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2778 points/GHz
3087 points/GHz
TOTAL
15133 points/GHz
17247 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4