| | | | | | |

Core i7-10750H vs i9-9880H


Description
The i7-10750H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i9-9880H is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10750H gets a score of 349.2 k points while the i9-9880H gets 381.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-9880H is 1.1 times faster than the i7-10750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0652
906ed
Core
Comet Lake-H
Coffee Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
45 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
16386 kB
Date
April 2020
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
75.67k points
73.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
349.21k points
381.53k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10750H
i9-9880H
Test#1 (Integers)
29.06k
27.81k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
26.49k
25.88k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.23k
5.65k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.89k
14.19k (x1.02)
TOTAL
75.67k
73.53k (x0.97)

Multithread

i7-10750H

i9-9880H
Test#1 (Integers)
154.61k
175.69k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
151.34k
166.56k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.33k
35.04k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.93k
4.23k (x0.61)
TOTAL
349.21k
381.53k (x1.09)

Performance/W
i7-10750H
i9-9880H
Test#1 (Integers)
3436 points/W
3904 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3363 points/W
3701 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
807 points/W
779 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
154 points/W
94 points/W
TOTAL
7760 points/W
8478 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-10750H
i9-9880H
Test#1 (Integers)
5811 points/GHz
5793 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5298 points/GHz
5392 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1246 points/GHz
1178 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2778 points/GHz
2956 points/GHz
TOTAL
15133 points/GHz
15319 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4