| | | | | | |

Core i7-10750H vs i7-860


Description
The i7-10750H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-860 is based on Nehalem.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10750H gets a score of 207.1 k points while the i7-860 gets 75.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-10750H is 2.7 times faster than the i7-860 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0652
106e5
Core
Comet Lake-H
Lynnfield
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
3.467 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
LGA 1156
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
45 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
8192 kB
Date
April 2020
September 2009
Mean monothread perf.
75.67k points
19.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
349.21k points
75.43k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-10750H
i7-860
Test#1 (Integers)
4.69k
2.15k (x0.46)
Test#2 (FP)
18.71k
4.87k (x0.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.84k
2.82k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.95k
3.13k (x0.22)
TOTAL
43.19k
12.97k (x0.3)

Multithread

i7-10750H

i7-860
Test#1 (Integers)
18.79k
8.24k (x0.44)
Test#2 (FP)
86.1k
21.63k (x0.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.42k
14.65k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.27k
5.02k (x0.95)
TOTAL
137.58k
49.54k (x0.36)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-10750H
i7-860
Test#1 (Integers)
16.63k
7.87k (x0.47)
Test#2 (FP)
24.17k
5.25k (x0.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.38k
2.94k (x0.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.69k
3.13k (x0.23)
TOTAL
60.87k
19.19k (x0.32)

Multithread

i7-10750H

i7-860
Test#1 (Integers)
67.07k
31.5k (x0.47)
Test#2 (FP)
107.95k
23.47k (x0.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.05k
15.47k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.07k
4.98k (x0.98)
TOTAL
207.14k
75.43k (x0.36)

Performance/W
i7-10750H
i7-860
Test#1 (Integers)
1490 points/W
332 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2399 points/W
247 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
601 points/W
163 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
113 points/W
52 points/W
TOTAL
4603 points/W
794 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-10750H
i7-860
Test#1 (Integers)
3325 points/GHz
2271 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4834 points/GHz
1514 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1277 points/GHz
847 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2738 points/GHz
902 points/GHz
TOTAL
12174 points/GHz
5534 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4