| | | | | | |

Core i7-10750H vs i7-9700F


Description
The i7-10750H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-9700F is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10750H gets a score of 207.1 k points while the i7-9700F gets 269.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-9700F is 1.3 times faster than the i7-10750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0652
906ed
Core
Comet Lake-H
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/8
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2020
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
75.67k points
60.93k points
Mean multithread perf.
349.21k points
269.85k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-10750H
i7-9700F
Test#1 (Integers)
4.69k
4.67k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
18.71k
17.16k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.84k
5.7k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.95k
14.37k (x1.03)
TOTAL
43.19k
41.9k (x0.97)

Multithread

i7-10750H

i7-9700F
Test#1 (Integers)
18.79k
26.31k (x1.4)
Test#2 (FP)
86.1k
97.53k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.42k
31.53k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.27k
8.94k (x1.7)
TOTAL
137.58k
164.31k (x1.19)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-10750H
i7-9700F
Test#1 (Integers)
16.63k
16.8k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
24.17k
24.08k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.38k
6.06k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.69k
13.98k (x1.02)
TOTAL
60.87k
60.93k (x1)

Multithread

i7-10750H

i7-9700F
Test#1 (Integers)
67.07k
92.79k (x1.38)
Test#2 (FP)
107.95k
135.13k (x1.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.05k
33.29k (x1.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.07k
8.64k (x1.7)
TOTAL
207.14k
269.85k (x1.3)

Performance/W
i7-10750H
i7-9700F
Test#1 (Integers)
1490 points/W
1428 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2399 points/W
2079 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
601 points/W
512 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
113 points/W
133 points/W
TOTAL
4603 points/W
4152 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-10750H
i7-9700F
Test#1 (Integers)
3325 points/GHz
3575 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4834 points/GHz
5124 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1277 points/GHz
1290 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2738 points/GHz
2975 points/GHz
TOTAL
12174 points/GHz
12964 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4