| | | | | | |

Core i7-10750H vs i7-6700


Description
The i7-10750H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-6700 is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10750H gets a score of 349.2 k points while the i7-6700 gets 243.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-10750H is 1.4 times faster than the i7-6700 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0652
506e3
Core
Comet Lake-H
Skylake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
8192 kB
Date
April 2020
May 2015
Mean monothread perf.
75.67k points
57.76k points
Mean multithread perf.
349.21k points
243.4k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10750H
i7-6700
Test#1 (Integers)
29.06k
24.83k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
26.49k
21.82k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.23k
4.98k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.89k
6.14k (x0.44)
TOTAL
75.67k
57.76k (x0.76)

Multithread

i7-10750H

i7-6700
Test#1 (Integers)
154.61k
109.79k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
151.34k
102.39k (x0.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.33k
24.72k (x0.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.93k
6.51k (x0.94)
TOTAL
349.21k
243.4k (x0.7)

Performance/W
i7-10750H
i7-6700
Test#1 (Integers)
3436 points/W
1689 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3363 points/W
1575 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
807 points/W
380 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
154 points/W
100 points/W
TOTAL
7760 points/W
3745 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-10750H
i7-6700
Test#1 (Integers)
5811 points/GHz
6206 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5298 points/GHz
5456 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1246 points/GHz
1244 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2778 points/GHz
1535 points/GHz
TOTAL
15133 points/GHz
14441 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4