| | | | | | |

Core i7-10750H vs i5-9500T


Description
The i7-10750H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i5-9500T is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10750H gets a score of 349.2 k points while the i5-9500T gets 274 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-10750H is 1.3 times faster than the i5-9500T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0652
906ea
Core
Comet Lake-H
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/6
TDP
45 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
9216 kB
Date
April 2020
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
75.67k points
61.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
349.21k points
274.02k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-10750H
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
4.69k
3.73k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
18.71k
15.41k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.84k
4.62k (x0.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.95k
10.59k (x0.76)
TOTAL
43.19k
34.35k (x0.8)

Multithread

i7-10750H

i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
18.79k
20.82k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
86.1k
85.48k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.42k
23.21k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.27k
4.11k (x0.78)
TOTAL
137.58k
133.63k (x0.97)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-10750H
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
16.63k
12.4k (x0.75)
Test#2 (FP)
24.17k
18.41k (x0.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.38k
4.69k (x0.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.69k
10.48k (x0.77)
TOTAL
60.87k
45.98k (x0.76)

Multithread

i7-10750H

i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
67.07k
74.86k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
107.95k
105.88k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.05k
22.34k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.07k
4.01k (x0.79)
TOTAL
207.14k
207.08k (x1)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-10750H
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
16.71k
13.46k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
25.45k
20.21k (x0.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.06k
4.72k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.2k
10.25k (x0.78)
TOTAL
61.43k
48.64k (x0.79)

Multithread

i7-10750H

i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
67.59k
74.65k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
111.94k
110.86k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.7k
22.08k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.3k
4.12k (x0.78)
TOTAL
212.53k
211.7k (x1)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10750H
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
29.06k
24.5k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
26.49k
21.41k (x0.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.23k
4.82k (x0.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.89k
10.73k (x0.77)
TOTAL
75.67k
61.46k (x0.81)

Multithread

i7-10750H

i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
154.61k
134.63k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
151.34k
113.61k (x0.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.33k
21.71k (x0.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.93k
4.07k (x0.59)
TOTAL
349.21k
274.02k (x0.78)

Performance/W
i7-10750H
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
3436 points/W
3846 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3363 points/W
3246 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
807 points/W
620 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
154 points/W
116 points/W
TOTAL
7760 points/W
7829 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-10750H
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
5811 points/GHz
6621 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5298 points/GHz
5786 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1246 points/GHz
1302 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2778 points/GHz
2901 points/GHz
TOTAL
15133 points/GHz
16610 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4