| | | | | | |

Core i7-10750H vs i5-8265U


Description
The i7-10750H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i5-8265U is based on Whiskey Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10750H gets a score of 349.2 k points while the i5-8265U gets 149.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-10750H is 2.3 times faster than the i5-8265U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0652
806eb
Core
Comet Lake-H
Whiskey Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
45 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2020
August 2018
Mean monothread perf.
75.67k points
57.57k points
Mean multithread perf.
349.21k points
149.48k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10750H
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
29.06k
24.32k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
26.49k
20.35k (x0.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.23k
4.38k (x0.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.89k
8.52k (x0.61)
TOTAL
75.67k
57.57k (x0.76)

Multithread

i7-10750H

i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
154.61k
65.17k (x0.42)
Test#2 (FP)
151.34k
63.6k (x0.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.33k
14.4k (x0.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.93k
6.31k (x0.91)
TOTAL
349.21k
149.48k (x0.43)

Performance/W
i7-10750H
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
3436 points/W
4345 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3363 points/W
4240 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
807 points/W
960 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
154 points/W
421 points/W
TOTAL
7760 points/W
9965 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-10750H
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
5811 points/GHz
6235 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5298 points/GHz
5219 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1246 points/GHz
1124 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2778 points/GHz
2183 points/GHz
TOTAL
15133 points/GHz
14762 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4