| | | | | | |

Core i7-10750H vs i5-6600K


Description
The i7-10750H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i5-6600K is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10750H gets a score of 212.5 k points while the i5-6600K gets 209.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-10750H is 1 times faster than the i5-6600K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0652
506e3
Core
Comet Lake-H
Skylake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/4
TDP
45 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2020
May 2015
Mean monothread perf.
75.67k points
59.28k points
Mean multithread perf.
349.21k points
209.28k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-10750H
i5-6600K
Test#1 (Integers)
16.71k
17.24k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
25.45k
26.5k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.06k
6.45k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.2k
9.09k (x0.69)
TOTAL
61.43k
59.28k (x0.97)

Multithread

i7-10750H

i5-6600K
Test#1 (Integers)
67.59k
68.47k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
111.94k
105.05k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.7k
25.24k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.3k
10.5k (x1.98)
TOTAL
212.53k
209.28k (x0.98)

Performance/W
i7-10750H
i5-6600K
Test#1 (Integers)
1502 points/W
721 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2487 points/W
1106 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
615 points/W
266 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
118 points/W
111 points/W
TOTAL
4723 points/W
2203 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-10750H
i5-6600K
Test#1 (Integers)
3342 points/GHz
4420 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5091 points/GHz
6795 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1213 points/GHz
1653 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2639 points/GHz
2331 points/GHz
TOTAL
12285 points/GHz
15199 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4