Core i7-10750H vs i5-10400T
Description
Both models i7-10750H and i5-10400T are based on Comet Lake architecture.
Comet Lake was released in 2019 as a 14nm process-refinement. These models were released as 10th generation CPUs like 10nm Ice Lake. There are model with 2 to 10 cores.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10750H gets a score of 349.2 k points while the i5-10400T gets 307.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10750H is 1.1 times faster than the i5-10400T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Comet Lake was released in 2019 as a 14nm process-refinement. These models were released as 10th generation CPUs like 10nm Ice Lake. There are model with 2 to 10 cores.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10750H gets a score of 349.2 k points while the i5-10400T gets 307.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10750H is 1.1 times faster than the i5-10400T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0652
a0653
Core
Comet Lake-H
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
45 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2020
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
75.67k points
57.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
349.21k points
307.18k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-10750H
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
4.69k
4k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
18.71k
14.19k (x0.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.84k
4.62k (x0.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.95k
11.03k (x0.79)
TOTAL
43.19k
33.84k (x0.78)
Multithread
i7-10750H
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
18.79k
22.77k (x1.21)
Test#2 (FP)
86.1k
96.59k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.42k
31.65k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.27k
2.45k (x0.46)
TOTAL
137.58k
153.46k (x1.12)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-10750H
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
16.63k
12.61k (x0.76)
Test#2 (FP)
24.17k
17.94k (x0.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.38k
4.83k (x0.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.69k
10.81k (x0.79)
TOTAL
60.87k
46.19k (x0.76)
Multithread
i7-10750H
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
67.07k
74.62k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
107.95k
119.63k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.05k
32.65k (x1.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.07k
2.52k (x0.5)
TOTAL
207.14k
229.42k (x1.11)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-10750H
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
16.71k
12.5k (x0.75)
Test#2 (FP)
25.45k
19.05k (x0.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.06k
4.72k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.2k
10.3k (x0.78)
TOTAL
61.43k
46.57k (x0.76)
Multithread
i7-10750H
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
67.59k
74.58k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
111.94k
126.96k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.7k
31.76k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.3k
2.5k (x0.47)
TOTAL
212.53k
235.8k (x1.11)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10750H
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
29.06k
22k (x0.76)
Test#2 (FP)
26.49k
19.98k (x0.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.23k
4.57k (x0.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.89k
11.31k (x0.81)
TOTAL
75.67k
57.85k (x0.76)
Multithread
i7-10750H
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
154.61k
136.69k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
151.34k
135.25k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.33k
32.76k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.93k
2.48k (x0.36)
TOTAL
349.21k
307.18k (x0.88)
Performance/W
i7-10750H
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
3436 points/W
3905 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3363 points/W
3864 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
807 points/W
936 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
154 points/W
71 points/W
TOTAL
7760 points/W
8776 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-10750H
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
5811 points/GHz
6111 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5298 points/GHz
5549 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1246 points/GHz
1268 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2778 points/GHz
3141 points/GHz
TOTAL
15133 points/GHz
16069 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4