Core i7-10750H vs i5-10400F
Description
Both models i7-10750H and i5-10400F are based on Comet Lake architecture.
Comet Lake was released in 2019 as a 14nm process-refinement. These models were released as 10th generation CPUs like 10nm Ice Lake. There are model with 2 to 10 cores.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10750H gets a score of 349.2 k points while the i5-10400F gets 370 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400F is 1.1 times faster than the i7-10750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Comet Lake was released in 2019 as a 14nm process-refinement. These models were released as 10th generation CPUs like 10nm Ice Lake. There are model with 2 to 10 cores.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10750H gets a score of 349.2 k points while the i5-10400F gets 370 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400F is 1.1 times faster than the i7-10750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0652
a0653
Core
Comet Lake-H
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2020
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
75.67k points
68.14k points
Mean multithread perf.
349.21k points
369.97k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-10750H
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
4.69k
4.3k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
18.71k
16.56k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.84k
5.25k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.95k
12.61k (x0.9)
TOTAL
43.19k
38.72k (x0.9)
Multithread
i7-10750H
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
18.79k
18.1k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
86.1k
79.16k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.42k
26.75k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.27k
13.81k (x2.62)
TOTAL
137.58k
137.82k (x1)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10750H
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
29.06k
26.28k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
26.49k
23.38k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.23k
5.52k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.89k
12.96k (x0.93)
TOTAL
75.67k
68.14k (x0.9)
Multithread
i7-10750H
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
154.61k
163.67k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
151.34k
159.74k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.33k
39k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.93k
7.56k (x1.09)
TOTAL
349.21k
369.97k (x1.06)
Performance/W
i7-10750H
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
3436 points/W
2518 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3363 points/W
2457 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
807 points/W
600 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
154 points/W
116 points/W
TOTAL
7760 points/W
5692 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-10750H
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
5811 points/GHz
6112 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5298 points/GHz
5438 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1246 points/GHz
1283 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2778 points/GHz
3014 points/GHz
TOTAL
15133 points/GHz
15847 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4