| | | | | | |

Core i7-10750H vs Celeron J4105


Description
The i7-10750H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the J4105 is based on Goldmont Plus.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10750H gets a score of 207.1 k points while the J4105 gets 61.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-10750H is 3.4 times faster than the J4105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0652
706a1
Core
Comet Lake-H
Gemini Lake
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
1.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
2.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
BGA 1090
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/4
TDP
45 W
10 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4096 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
0 kB
Date
April 2020
December 2017
Mean monothread perf.
75.67k points
18.22k points
Mean multithread perf.
349.21k points
61.49k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-10750H
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
4.69k
1.68k (x0.36)
Test#2 (FP)
18.71k
5.29k (x0.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.84k
2.75k (x0.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.95k
3.44k (x0.25)
TOTAL
43.19k
13.16k (x0.3)

Multithread

i7-10750H

J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
18.79k
6.39k (x0.34)
Test#2 (FP)
86.1k
20.02k (x0.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.42k
10.22k (x0.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.27k
4.94k (x0.94)
TOTAL
137.58k
41.57k (x0.3)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-10750H
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
16.63k
4.9k (x0.29)
Test#2 (FP)
24.17k
7.26k (x0.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.38k
2.75k (x0.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.69k
3.32k (x0.24)
TOTAL
60.87k
18.22k (x0.3)

Multithread

i7-10750H

J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
67.07k
18.84k (x0.28)
Test#2 (FP)
107.95k
27.45k (x0.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.05k
10.35k (x0.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.07k
4.85k (x0.96)
TOTAL
207.14k
61.49k (x0.3)

Performance/W
i7-10750H
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
1490 points/W
1884 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2399 points/W
2745 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
601 points/W
1035 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
113 points/W
485 points/W
TOTAL
4603 points/W
6149 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-10750H
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
3325 points/GHz
1958 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4834 points/GHz
2902 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1277 points/GHz
1102 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2738 points/GHz
1327 points/GHz
TOTAL
12174 points/GHz
7289 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4