Core i7-10750H vs Ryzen 9 5950X
Description
The i7-10750H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 5950X is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10750H gets a score of 349.2 k points while the 5950X gets 1081 k points.
Summarizing, the 5950X is 3.1 times faster than the i7-10750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10750H gets a score of 349.2 k points while the 5950X gets 1081 k points.
Summarizing, the 5950X is 3.1 times faster than the i7-10750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0652
a20f10
Core
Comet Lake-H
Vermeer
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
16/32
TDP
45 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
16x32+16x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
16x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
2x32768 kB
Date
April 2020
November 2020
Mean monothread perf.
75.67k points
87.3k points
Mean multithread perf.
349.21k points
1080.96k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10750H
5950X
Test#1 (Integers)
29.06k
22.91k (x0.79)
Test#2 (FP)
26.49k
26.24k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.23k
11.87k (x1.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.89k
26.28k (x1.89)
TOTAL
75.67k
87.3k (x1.15)
Multithread
i7-10750H
5950X
Test#1 (Integers)
154.61k
359.17k (x2.32)
Test#2 (FP)
151.34k
479.04k (x3.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.33k
214.59k (x5.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.93k
28.16k (x4.07)
TOTAL
349.21k
1080.96k (x3.1)
Performance/W
i7-10750H
5950X
Test#1 (Integers)
3436 points/W
3421 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3363 points/W
4562 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
807 points/W
2044 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
154 points/W
268 points/W
TOTAL
7760 points/W
10295 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-10750H
5950X
Test#1 (Integers)
5811 points/GHz
4676 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5298 points/GHz
5355 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1246 points/GHz
2423 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2778 points/GHz
5363 points/GHz
TOTAL
15133 points/GHz
17817 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4