Core i7-10750H vs Ryzen 9 5900X
Description
The i7-10750H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 5900X is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10750H gets a score of 349.2 k points while the 5900X gets 840.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900X is 2.4 times faster than the i7-10750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10750H gets a score of 349.2 k points while the 5900X gets 840.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900X is 2.4 times faster than the i7-10750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0652
a20f10
Core
Comet Lake-H
Vermeer
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
12/24
TDP
45 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
12x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
2x32768 kB
Date
April 2020
November 2020
Mean monothread perf.
75.67k points
89.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
349.21k points
840.11k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10750H
5900X
Test#1 (Integers)
29.06k
24.34k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
26.49k
26.8k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.23k
12.12k (x1.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.89k
26.55k (x1.91)
TOTAL
75.67k
89.82k (x1.19)
Multithread
i7-10750H
5900X
Test#1 (Integers)
154.61k
263.12k (x1.7)
Test#2 (FP)
151.34k
353.9k (x2.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.33k
159.07k (x4.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.93k
64.01k (x9.24)
TOTAL
349.21k
840.11k (x2.41)
Performance/W
i7-10750H
5900X
Test#1 (Integers)
3436 points/W
2506 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3363 points/W
3371 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
807 points/W
1515 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
154 points/W
610 points/W
TOTAL
7760 points/W
8001 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-10750H
5900X
Test#1 (Integers)
5811 points/GHz
5071 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5298 points/GHz
5584 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1246 points/GHz
2526 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2778 points/GHz
5530 points/GHz
TOTAL
15133 points/GHz
18712 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4