Core i7-10750H vs Ryzen 9 3900
Description
The i7-10750H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 3900 is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10750H gets a score of 349.2 k points while the 3900 gets 687.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 3900 is 2 times faster than the i7-10750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10750H gets a score of 349.2 k points while the 3900 gets 687.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 3900 is 2 times faster than the i7-10750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0652
870f10
Core
Comet Lake-H
Matisse
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
12/24
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
12x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
4x16384 kB
Date
April 2020
September 2019
Mean monothread perf.
75.67k points
74.97k points
Mean multithread perf.
349.21k points
687.5k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-10750H
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
4.69k
4.39k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
18.71k
16.99k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.84k
7.74k (x1.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.95k
24.57k (x1.76)
TOTAL
43.19k
53.69k (x1.24)
Multithread
i7-10750H
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
18.79k
48.45k (x2.58)
Test#2 (FP)
86.1k
230.81k (x2.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.42k
122.82k (x4.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.27k
54.73k (x10.38)
TOTAL
137.58k
456.8k (x3.32)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-10750H
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
16.63k
16.59k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
24.17k
24.55k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.38k
8.55k (x1.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.69k
26.28k (x1.92)
TOTAL
60.87k
75.97k (x1.25)
Multithread
i7-10750H
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
67.07k
181.33k (x2.7)
Test#2 (FP)
107.95k
261.01k (x2.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.05k
126.62k (x4.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.07k
66.64k (x13.13)
TOTAL
207.14k
635.6k (x3.07)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-10750H
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
16.71k
16.16k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
25.45k
23.75k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.06k
9.32k (x1.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.2k
23.17k (x1.76)
TOTAL
61.43k
72.4k (x1.18)
Multithread
i7-10750H
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
67.59k
174.73k (x2.59)
Test#2 (FP)
111.94k
275.63k (x2.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.7k
125.65k (x4.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.3k
44.17k (x8.33)
TOTAL
212.53k
620.18k (x2.92)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10750H
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
29.06k
16.85k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
26.49k
26.03k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.23k
9.54k (x1.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.89k
22.55k (x1.62)
TOTAL
75.67k
74.97k (x0.99)
Multithread
i7-10750H
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
154.61k
229.41k (x1.48)
Test#2 (FP)
151.34k
292.81k (x1.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.33k
128.48k (x3.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.93k
36.8k (x5.31)
TOTAL
349.21k
687.5k (x1.97)
Performance/W
i7-10750H
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
3436 points/W
3529 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3363 points/W
4505 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
807 points/W
1977 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
154 points/W
566 points/W
TOTAL
7760 points/W
10577 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-10750H
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
5811 points/GHz
3920 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5298 points/GHz
6054 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1246 points/GHz
2218 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2778 points/GHz
5243 points/GHz
TOTAL
15133 points/GHz
17435 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4