| | | | | | |

Core i7-10750H vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE


Description
The i7-10750H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 4750GE is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10750H gets a score of 349.2 k points while the 4750GE gets 469.7 k points.

Summarizing, the 4750GE is 1.3 times faster than the i7-10750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0652
860f01
Core
Comet Lake-H
Renoir
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
45 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
April 2020
July 2020
Mean monothread perf.
75.67k points
60.99k points
Mean multithread perf.
349.21k points
469.67k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10750H
4750GE
Test#1 (Integers)
29.06k
16.95k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
26.49k
26.26k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.23k
9.4k (x1.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.89k
8.38k (x0.6)
TOTAL
75.67k
60.99k (x0.81)

Multithread

i7-10750H

4750GE
Test#1 (Integers)
154.61k
159.87k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
151.34k
215.44k (x1.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.33k
88.45k (x2.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.93k
5.9k (x0.85)
TOTAL
349.21k
469.67k (x1.34)

Performance/W
i7-10750H
4750GE
Test#1 (Integers)
3436 points/W
4568 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3363 points/W
6155 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
807 points/W
2527 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
154 points/W
169 points/W
TOTAL
7760 points/W
13419 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-10750H
4750GE
Test#1 (Integers)
5811 points/GHz
3942 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5298 points/GHz
6107 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1246 points/GHz
2185 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2778 points/GHz
1950 points/GHz
TOTAL
15133 points/GHz
14184 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4