Core i7-10750H vs Ryzen 7 5800X
Description
The i7-10750H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 5800X is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10750H gets a score of 349.2 k points while the 5800X gets 558.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 5800X is 1.6 times faster than the i7-10750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10750H gets a score of 349.2 k points while the 5800X gets 558.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 5800X is 1.6 times faster than the i7-10750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0652
a20f10
Core
Comet Lake-H
Vermeer
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
45 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
32768 kB
Date
April 2020
November 2020
Mean monothread perf.
75.67k points
89.07k points
Mean multithread perf.
349.21k points
558.42k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10750H
5800X
Test#1 (Integers)
29.06k
24.14k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
26.49k
26.3k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.23k
12.09k (x1.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.89k
26.54k (x1.91)
TOTAL
75.67k
89.07k (x1.18)
Multithread
i7-10750H
5800X
Test#1 (Integers)
154.61k
183.54k (x1.19)
Test#2 (FP)
151.34k
237.27k (x1.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.33k
107.95k (x2.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.93k
29.66k (x4.28)
TOTAL
349.21k
558.42k (x1.6)
Performance/W
i7-10750H
5800X
Test#1 (Integers)
3436 points/W
1748 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3363 points/W
2260 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
807 points/W
1028 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
154 points/W
282 points/W
TOTAL
7760 points/W
5318 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-10750H
5800X
Test#1 (Integers)
5811 points/GHz
5137 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5298 points/GHz
5596 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1246 points/GHz
2571 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2778 points/GHz
5646 points/GHz
TOTAL
15133 points/GHz
18951 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4