| | | | | | |

Core i7-10750H vs Ryzen 7 3800X


Description
The i7-10750H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 3800X is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10750H gets a score of 349.2 k points while the 3800X gets 497.7 k points.

Summarizing, the 3800X is 1.4 times faster than the i7-10750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0652
870f10
Core
Comet Lake-H
Matisse
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
45 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
32768 kB
Date
April 2020
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
75.67k points
75.81k points
Mean multithread perf.
349.21k points
497.74k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-10750H
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
4.69k
4.47k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
18.71k
17.41k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.84k
8.23k (x1.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.95k
25.15k (x1.8)
TOTAL
43.19k
55.26k (x1.28)

Multithread

i7-10750H

3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
18.79k
36.1k (x1.92)
Test#2 (FP)
86.1k
178.65k (x2.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.42k
95.98k (x3.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.27k
16.03k (x3.04)
TOTAL
137.58k
326.76k (x2.38)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-10750H
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
16.63k
17.17k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
24.17k
25.32k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.38k
8.36k (x1.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.69k
27.86k (x2.04)
TOTAL
60.87k
78.71k (x1.29)

Multithread

i7-10750H

3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
67.07k
136.06k (x2.03)
Test#2 (FP)
107.95k
195.06k (x1.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.05k
97.81k (x3.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.07k
12.91k (x2.54)
TOTAL
207.14k
441.85k (x2.13)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-10750H
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
16.71k
16.76k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
25.45k
25.16k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.06k
8.76k (x1.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.2k
24.3k (x1.84)
TOTAL
61.43k
74.98k (x1.22)

Multithread

i7-10750H

3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
67.59k
131.36k (x1.94)
Test#2 (FP)
111.94k
198.51k (x1.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.7k
97.27k (x3.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.3k
13.4k (x2.53)
TOTAL
212.53k
440.54k (x2.07)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10750H
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
29.06k
17.1k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
26.49k
26.59k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.23k
8.91k (x1.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.89k
23.21k (x1.67)
TOTAL
75.67k
75.81k (x1)

Multithread

i7-10750H

3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
154.61k
172.04k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
151.34k
214.03k (x1.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.33k
97.1k (x2.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.93k
14.57k (x2.1)
TOTAL
349.21k
497.74k (x1.43)

Performance/W
i7-10750H
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
3436 points/W
1638 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3363 points/W
2038 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
807 points/W
925 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
154 points/W
139 points/W
TOTAL
7760 points/W
4740 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-10750H
3800X
Test#1 (Integers)
5811 points/GHz
3799 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5298 points/GHz
5909 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1246 points/GHz
1981 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2778 points/GHz
5158 points/GHz
TOTAL
15133 points/GHz
16847 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4