| | | | | | |

Core i7-10750H vs Ryzen 7 3750H


Description
The i7-10750H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 3750H is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10750H gets a score of 349.2 k points while the 3750H gets 175.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-10750H is 2 times faster than the 3750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0652
810f81
Core
Comet Lake-H
Picasso
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
45 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2020
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
75.67k points
46.91k points
Mean multithread perf.
349.21k points
175.18k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-10750H
3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
4.69k
3.78k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
18.71k
16.42k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.84k
4.75k (x0.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.95k
5.51k (x0.4)
TOTAL
43.19k
30.46k (x0.71)

Multithread

i7-10750H

3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
18.79k
15.18k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
86.1k
74.87k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.42k
27.85k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.27k
6.08k (x1.15)
TOTAL
137.58k
123.97k (x0.9)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10750H
3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
29.06k
13.72k (x0.47)
Test#2 (FP)
26.49k
22.93k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.23k
4.99k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.89k
5.27k (x0.38)
TOTAL
75.67k
46.91k (x0.62)

Multithread

i7-10750H

3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
154.61k
50.54k (x0.33)
Test#2 (FP)
151.34k
93.33k (x0.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.33k
25.25k (x0.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.93k
6.07k (x0.88)
TOTAL
349.21k
175.18k (x0.5)

Performance/W
i7-10750H
3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
3436 points/W
1444 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3363 points/W
2667 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
807 points/W
721 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
154 points/W
173 points/W
TOTAL
7760 points/W
5005 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-10750H
3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
5811 points/GHz
3430 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5298 points/GHz
5733 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1246 points/GHz
1248 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2778 points/GHz
1317 points/GHz
TOTAL
15133 points/GHz
11726 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4