| | | | | | |

Core i7-10750H vs Ryzen 7 2700X


Description
The i7-10750H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 2700X is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10750H gets a score of 349.2 k points while the 2700X gets 433.2 k points.

Summarizing, the 2700X is 1.2 times faster than the i7-10750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0652
800f82
Core
Comet Lake-H
Pinnacle Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
45 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
16384 kB
Date
April 2020
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
75.67k points
65.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
349.21k points
433.19k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-10750H
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
4.69k
4.25k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
18.71k
19.72k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.84k
5.84k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.95k
21.36k (x1.53)
TOTAL
43.19k
51.17k (x1.18)

Multithread

i7-10750H

2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
18.79k
35.04k (x1.87)
Test#2 (FP)
86.1k
181.42k (x2.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.42k
64.86k (x2.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.27k
8.21k (x1.56)
TOTAL
137.58k
289.54k (x2.1)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-10750H
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
16.63k
15.22k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
24.17k
24.12k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.38k
5.87k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.69k
21k (x1.53)
TOTAL
60.87k
66.21k (x1.09)

Multithread

i7-10750H

2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
67.07k
126.81k (x1.89)
Test#2 (FP)
107.95k
229.86k (x2.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.05k
61.74k (x2.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.07k
9.77k (x1.93)
TOTAL
207.14k
428.19k (x2.07)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-10750H
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
16.71k
14.44k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
25.45k
24.92k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.06k
5.8k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.2k
19.07k (x1.45)
TOTAL
61.43k
64.24k (x1.05)

Multithread

i7-10750H

2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
67.59k
122.01k (x1.81)
Test#2 (FP)
111.94k
220.34k (x1.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.7k
59.89k (x2.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.3k
9.9k (x1.87)
TOTAL
212.53k
412.13k (x1.94)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10750H
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
29.06k
15.61k (x0.54)
Test#2 (FP)
26.49k
26.08k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.23k
5.84k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.89k
18.34k (x1.32)
TOTAL
75.67k
65.87k (x0.87)

Multithread

i7-10750H

2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
154.61k
123.33k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
151.34k
240.46k (x1.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.33k
61.23k (x1.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.93k
8.17k (x1.18)
TOTAL
349.21k
433.19k (x1.24)

Performance/W
i7-10750H
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
3436 points/W
1175 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3363 points/W
2290 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
807 points/W
583 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
154 points/W
78 points/W
TOTAL
7760 points/W
4126 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-10750H
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
5811 points/GHz
3631 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5298 points/GHz
6065 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1246 points/GHz
1357 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2778 points/GHz
4266 points/GHz
TOTAL
15133 points/GHz
15319 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4