| | | | | | |

Core i7-10750H vs Ryzen 7 1700X


Description
The i7-10750H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 1700X is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10750H gets a score of 349.2 k points while the 1700X gets 372.7 k points.

Summarizing, the 1700X is 1.1 times faster than the i7-10750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0652
800f11
Core
Comet Lake-H
Summit Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
45 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
April 2020
March 2017
Mean monothread perf.
75.67k points
56.76k points
Mean multithread perf.
349.21k points
372.73k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-10750H
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
16.71k
12.5k (x0.75)
Test#2 (FP)
25.45k
22.92k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.06k
5.45k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.2k
14.72k (x1.12)
TOTAL
61.43k
55.59k (x0.91)

Multithread

i7-10750H

1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
67.59k
92.51k (x1.37)
Test#2 (FP)
111.94k
144.76k (x1.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.7k
54.43k (x1.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.3k
22.08k (x4.17)
TOTAL
212.53k
313.78k (x1.48)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10750H
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
29.06k
13.72k (x0.47)
Test#2 (FP)
26.49k
22.48k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.23k
5.12k (x0.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.89k
15.44k (x1.11)
TOTAL
75.67k
56.76k (x0.75)

Multithread

i7-10750H

1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
154.61k
110.92k (x0.72)
Test#2 (FP)
151.34k
200.56k (x1.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.33k
54.24k (x1.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.93k
7.01k (x1.01)
TOTAL
349.21k
372.73k (x1.07)

Performance/W
i7-10750H
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
3436 points/W
1168 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3363 points/W
2111 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
807 points/W
571 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
154 points/W
74 points/W
TOTAL
7760 points/W
3923 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-10750H
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
5811 points/GHz
3611 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5298 points/GHz
5916 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1246 points/GHz
1348 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2778 points/GHz
4063 points/GHz
TOTAL
15133 points/GHz
14938 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4