Core i7-10750H vs Ryzen 5 3600
Description
The i7-10750H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 3600 is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10750H gets a score of 349.2 k points while the 3600 gets 348.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10750H is 1 times faster than the 3600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10750H gets a score of 349.2 k points while the 3600 gets 348.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10750H is 1 times faster than the 3600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0652
870f10
Core
Comet Lake-H
Matisse
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
32768 kB
Date
April 2020
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
75.67k points
70.55k points
Mean multithread perf.
349.21k points
348.35k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-10750H
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
4.69k
4.2k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
18.71k
17.36k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.84k
7.5k (x1.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.95k
23.79k (x1.71)
TOTAL
43.19k
52.85k (x1.22)
Multithread
i7-10750H
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
18.79k
22.11k (x1.18)
Test#2 (FP)
86.1k
108.04k (x1.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.42k
56.81k (x2.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.27k
36.39k (x6.9)
TOTAL
137.58k
223.36k (x1.62)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-10750H
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
16.63k
15.38k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
24.17k
21.94k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.38k
7.97k (x1.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.69k
24.76k (x1.81)
TOTAL
60.87k
70.05k (x1.15)
Multithread
i7-10750H
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
67.07k
96.91k (x1.44)
Test#2 (FP)
107.95k
135.12k (x1.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.05k
70.39k (x2.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.07k
56.43k (x11.12)
TOTAL
207.14k
358.85k (x1.73)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-10750H
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
16.71k
15.04k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
25.45k
20.95k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.06k
8.57k (x1.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.2k
21.71k (x1.65)
TOTAL
61.43k
66.27k (x1.08)
Multithread
i7-10750H
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
67.59k
94.36k (x1.4)
Test#2 (FP)
111.94k
141.73k (x1.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.7k
69.38k (x2.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.3k
32.72k (x6.17)
TOTAL
212.53k
338.19k (x1.59)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10750H
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
29.06k
16.04k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
26.49k
24.47k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.23k
8.38k (x1.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.89k
21.66k (x1.56)
TOTAL
75.67k
70.55k (x0.93)
Multithread
i7-10750H
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
154.61k
113.63k (x0.73)
Test#2 (FP)
151.34k
143.55k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.33k
63.84k (x1.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.93k
27.34k (x3.95)
TOTAL
349.21k
348.35k (x1)
Performance/W
i7-10750H
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
3436 points/W
1748 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3363 points/W
2208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
807 points/W
982 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
154 points/W
421 points/W
TOTAL
7760 points/W
5359 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-10750H
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
5811 points/GHz
3819 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5298 points/GHz
5825 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1246 points/GHz
1995 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2778 points/GHz
5158 points/GHz
TOTAL
15133 points/GHz
16797 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4