| | | | | | |

Core i7-10750H vs Ryzen 5 2600


Description
The i7-10750H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 2600 is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10750H gets a score of 349.2 k points while the 2600 gets 292.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-10750H is 1.2 times faster than the 2600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0652
800f82
Core
Comet Lake-H
Pinnacle Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
April 2020
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
75.67k points
57.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
349.21k points
292.31k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-10750H
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
4.69k
3.41k (x0.73)
Test#2 (FP)
18.71k
15.96k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.84k
4.69k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.95k
17.42k (x1.25)
TOTAL
43.19k
41.47k (x0.96)

Multithread

i7-10750H

2600
Test#1 (Integers)
18.79k
20.88k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
86.1k
110.37k (x1.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.42k
39.25k (x1.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.27k
6.66k (x1.26)
TOTAL
137.58k
177.16k (x1.29)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10750H
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
29.06k
13.83k (x0.48)
Test#2 (FP)
26.49k
23.16k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.23k
5.15k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.89k
15.18k (x1.09)
TOTAL
75.67k
57.33k (x0.76)

Multithread

i7-10750H

2600
Test#1 (Integers)
154.61k
83.44k (x0.54)
Test#2 (FP)
151.34k
161.53k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.33k
40.62k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.93k
6.72k (x0.97)
TOTAL
349.21k
292.31k (x0.84)

Performance/W
i7-10750H
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
3436 points/W
1284 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3363 points/W
2485 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
807 points/W
625 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
154 points/W
103 points/W
TOTAL
7760 points/W
4497 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-10750H
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
5811 points/GHz
3547 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5298 points/GHz
5938 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1246 points/GHz
1321 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2778 points/GHz
3893 points/GHz
TOTAL
15133 points/GHz
14699 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4