Core i7-10750H vs FX 9590
Description
The i7-10750H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 9590 is based on Piledriver.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10750H gets a score of 212.5 k points while the 9590 gets 137.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10750H is 1.5 times faster than the 9590. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10750H gets a score of 212.5 k points while the 9590 gets 137.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10750H is 1.5 times faster than the 9590. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0652
600f20
Core
Comet Lake-H
Vishera
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
4.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
Socket AM3+
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/8
TDP
45 W
220 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x2048 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
8192 kB
Date
April 2020
July 2013
Mean monothread perf.
75.67k points
32.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
349.21k points
137.65k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-10750H
9590
Test#1 (Integers)
16.71k
11.51k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
25.45k
9.57k (x0.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.06k
4.19k (x0.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.2k
7.14k (x0.54)
TOTAL
61.43k
32.41k (x0.53)
Multithread
i7-10750H
9590
Test#1 (Integers)
67.59k
55.13k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
111.94k
51.69k (x0.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.7k
27.02k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.3k
3.81k (x0.72)
TOTAL
212.53k
137.65k (x0.65)
Performance/W
i7-10750H
9590
Test#1 (Integers)
1502 points/W
251 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2487 points/W
235 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
615 points/W
123 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
118 points/W
17 points/W
TOTAL
4723 points/W
626 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-10750H
9590
Test#1 (Integers)
3342 points/GHz
2302 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5091 points/GHz
1914 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1213 points/GHz
837 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2639 points/GHz
1429 points/GHz
TOTAL
12285 points/GHz
6482 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4