| | | | | | |

Core i7-10750H vs i7-1260P


Description
The i7-10750H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-1260P is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10750H gets a score of 349.2 k points while the i7-1260P gets 391.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-1260P is 1.1 times faster than the i7-10750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0652
906a3
Core
Comet Lake-H
Alder Lake-P
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
6/12
12/16
TDP
45 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32/8X64+4x48/8X32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x1280+8x2048 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
18432 kB
Date
April 2020
February 2022
Mean monothread perf.
75.67k points
94.9k points
Mean multithread perf.
349.21k points
391.07k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10750H
i7-1260P
Test#1 (Integers)
29.06k
41.94k (x1.44)
Test#2 (FP)
26.49k
26.81k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.23k
12.63k (x2.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.89k
13.51k (x0.97)
TOTAL
75.67k
94.9k (x1.25)

Multithread

i7-10750H

i7-1260P
Test#1 (Integers)
154.61k
168.12k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
151.34k
148.09k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.33k
60.28k (x1.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.93k
14.58k (x2.11)
TOTAL
349.21k
391.07k (x1.12)

Performance/W
i7-10750H
i7-1260P
Test#1 (Integers)
3436 points/W
6004 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3363 points/W
5289 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
807 points/W
2153 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
154 points/W
521 points/W
TOTAL
7760 points/W
13967 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-10750H
i7-1260P
Test#1 (Integers)
5811 points/GHz
8924 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5298 points/GHz
5705 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1246 points/GHz
2687 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2778 points/GHz
2875 points/GHz
TOTAL
15133 points/GHz
20191 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4