| | | | | | |

Core i7-10750H vs i7-1195G7


Description
The i7-10750H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-1195G7 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10750H gets a score of 349.2 k points while the i7-1195G7 gets 239.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-10750H is 1.5 times faster than the i7-1195G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0652
806c2
Core
Comet Lake-H
Tiger Lake UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
5 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
BGA 1499
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
45 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2020
May 2021
Mean monothread perf.
75.67k points
82.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
349.21k points
239.58k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-10750H
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
4.69k
4.57k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
18.71k
17.21k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.84k
9.97k (x1.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.95k
14.98k (x1.07)
TOTAL
43.19k
46.75k (x1.08)

Multithread

i7-10750H

i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
18.79k
12.75k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
86.1k
45.98k (x0.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.42k
27.86k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.27k
20.06k (x3.8)
TOTAL
137.58k
106.66k (x0.78)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10750H
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
29.06k
30.89k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
26.49k
25.57k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.23k
10.64k (x1.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.89k
15.66k (x1.13)
TOTAL
75.67k
82.77k (x1.09)

Multithread

i7-10750H

i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
154.61k
96.34k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
151.34k
95.75k (x0.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.33k
32.29k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.93k
15.2k (x2.19)
TOTAL
349.21k
239.58k (x0.69)

Performance/W
i7-10750H
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
3436 points/W
3441 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3363 points/W
3420 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
807 points/W
1153 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
154 points/W
543 points/W
TOTAL
7760 points/W
8557 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-10750H
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
5811 points/GHz
6179 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5298 points/GHz
5115 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1246 points/GHz
2128 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2778 points/GHz
3133 points/GHz
TOTAL
15133 points/GHz
16555 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4