Core i7-10700 vs i9-9900K
Description
The i7-10700 is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i9-9900K is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10700 gets a score of 537.7 k points while the i9-9900K gets 529.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10700 is 1 times faster than the i9-9900K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10700 gets a score of 537.7 k points while the i9-9900K gets 529.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10700 is 1 times faster than the i9-9900K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0655
906ed
Core
Comet Lake-S
Coffee Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
65 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
16386 kB
16384 kB
Date
April 2020
October 2018
Mean monothread perf.
74.53k points
81.91k points
Mean multithread perf.
537.73k points
529.32k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10700
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
30.66k
32.08k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
25.64k
28.17k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.98k
6.68k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.25k
14.98k (x1.22)
TOTAL
74.53k
81.91k (x1.1)
Multithread
i7-10700
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
240.28k
242.98k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
234.3k
220.16k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
56.12k
53.97k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.02k
12.22k (x1.74)
TOTAL
537.73k
529.32k (x0.98)
Performance/W
i7-10700
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
3697 points/W
2558 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3605 points/W
2317 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
863 points/W
568 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
108 points/W
129 points/W
TOTAL
8273 points/W
5572 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-10700
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
6388 points/GHz
6417 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5341 points/GHz
5634 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1245 points/GHz
1335 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2553 points/GHz
2996 points/GHz
TOTAL
15527 points/GHz
16382 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4