Core i7-10700 vs Ryzen 9 5900X
Description
The i7-10700 is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 5900X is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10700 gets a score of 537.7 k points while the 5900X gets 840.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900X is 1.6 times faster than the i7-10700. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10700 gets a score of 537.7 k points while the 5900X gets 840.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900X is 1.6 times faster than the i7-10700. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0655
a20f10
Core
Comet Lake-S
Vermeer
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
12/24
TDP
65 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
12x512 kB
Cache L3
16386 kB
2x32768 kB
Date
April 2020
November 2020
Mean monothread perf.
74.53k points
89.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
537.73k points
840.11k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10700
5900X
Test#1 (Integers)
30.66k
24.34k (x0.79)
Test#2 (FP)
25.64k
26.8k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.98k
12.12k (x2.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.25k
26.55k (x2.17)
TOTAL
74.53k
89.82k (x1.21)
Multithread
i7-10700
5900X
Test#1 (Integers)
240.28k
263.12k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
234.3k
353.9k (x1.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
56.12k
159.07k (x2.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.02k
64.01k (x9.11)
TOTAL
537.73k
840.11k (x1.56)
Performance/W
i7-10700
5900X
Test#1 (Integers)
3697 points/W
2506 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3605 points/W
3371 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
863 points/W
1515 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
108 points/W
610 points/W
TOTAL
8273 points/W
8001 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-10700
5900X
Test#1 (Integers)
6388 points/GHz
5071 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5341 points/GHz
5584 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1245 points/GHz
2526 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2553 points/GHz
5530 points/GHz
TOTAL
15527 points/GHz
18712 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4