Core i7-1065G7 vs Xeon Silver 4110
Description
The i7-1065G7 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the 4110 is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1065G7 gets a score of 214.3 k points while the 4110 gets 281.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 4110 is 1.3 times faster than the i7-1065G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1065G7 gets a score of 214.3 k points while the 4110 gets 281.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 4110 is 1.3 times faster than the i7-1065G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
706e5
50654
Core
Ice Lake-U
Skylake-SP
Base frecuency
1.3 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
LGA3647
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
15 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
11264 kB
Date
August 2019
July 2017
Mean monothread perf.
74.82k points
45.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
214.34k points
281.48k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1065G7
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
28.19k
18.78k (x0.67)
Test#2 (FP)
22.13k
16.25k (x0.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.32k
3.99k (x0.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.17k
6.8k (x0.48)
TOTAL
74.82k
45.82k (x0.61)
Multithread
i7-1065G7
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
86.39k
133.55k (x1.55)
Test#2 (FP)
86.22k
108.43k (x1.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.99k
30.02k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.75k
9.48k (x1.08)
TOTAL
214.34k
281.48k (x1.31)
Performance/W
i7-1065G7
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
5759 points/W
1571 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5748 points/W
1276 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2199 points/W
353 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
583 points/W
112 points/W
TOTAL
14289 points/W
3311 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-1065G7
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
7229 points/GHz
6259 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5675 points/GHz
5417 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2646 points/GHz
1330 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3634 points/GHz
2267 points/GHz
TOTAL
19184 points/GHz
15273 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4