| | | | | | |

Core i7-1065G7 vs Xeon Bronze 3206R


Description
The i7-1065G7 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the 3206R is based on Cascade Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1065G7 gets a score of 214.3 k points while the 3206R gets 216 k points.

Summarizing, the 3206R is 1 times faster than the i7-1065G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706e5
50657
Core
Ice Lake-U
Cascade Lake-SP
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.3 GHz
1.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
1.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
LGA 3647-0
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/8
TDP
15 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
11264 kB
Date
August 2019
February 2020
Mean monothread perf.
74.82k points
31.52k points
Mean multithread perf.
214.34k points
216.02k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1065G7
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
28.19k
12.92k (x0.46)
Test#2 (FP)
22.13k
10.97k (x0.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.32k
2.54k (x0.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.17k
5.09k (x0.36)
TOTAL
74.82k
31.52k (x0.42)

Multithread

i7-1065G7

3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
86.39k
103.33k (x1.2)
Test#2 (FP)
86.22k
87.67k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.99k
20.1k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.75k
4.91k (x0.56)
TOTAL
214.34k
216.02k (x1.01)

Performance/W
i7-1065G7
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
5759 points/W
1216 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5748 points/W
1031 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2199 points/W
237 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
583 points/W
58 points/W
TOTAL
14289 points/W
2541 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-1065G7
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
7229 points/GHz
6801 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5675 points/GHz
5774 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2646 points/GHz
1334 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3634 points/GHz
2678 points/GHz
TOTAL
19184 points/GHz
16588 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4