Core i7-1065G7 vs i9-9900K
Description
The i7-1065G7 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the i9-9900K is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1065G7 gets a score of 214.3 k points while the i9-9900K gets 529.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-9900K is 2.5 times faster than the i7-1065G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1065G7 gets a score of 214.3 k points while the i9-9900K gets 529.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-9900K is 2.5 times faster than the i7-1065G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
706e5
906ed
Core
Ice Lake-U
Coffee Lake-S
Base frecuency
1.3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
15 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
16384 kB
Date
August 2019
October 2018
Mean monothread perf.
74.82k points
81.91k points
Mean multithread perf.
214.34k points
529.32k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1065G7
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
28.19k
32.08k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
22.13k
28.17k (x1.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.32k
6.68k (x0.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.17k
14.98k (x1.06)
TOTAL
74.82k
81.91k (x1.09)
Multithread
i7-1065G7
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
86.39k
242.98k (x2.81)
Test#2 (FP)
86.22k
220.16k (x2.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.99k
53.97k (x1.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.75k
12.22k (x1.4)
TOTAL
214.34k
529.32k (x2.47)
Performance/W
i7-1065G7
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
5759 points/W
2558 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5748 points/W
2317 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2199 points/W
568 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
583 points/W
129 points/W
TOTAL
14289 points/W
5572 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-1065G7
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
7229 points/GHz
6417 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5675 points/GHz
5634 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2646 points/GHz
1335 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3634 points/GHz
2996 points/GHz
TOTAL
19184 points/GHz
16382 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4