Core i7-1065G7 vs i7-8750H
Description
The i7-1065G7 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the i7-8750H is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1065G7 gets a score of 214.3 k points while the i7-8750H gets 231.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-8750H is 1.1 times faster than the i7-1065G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1065G7 gets a score of 214.3 k points while the i7-8750H gets 231.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-8750H is 1.1 times faster than the i7-1065G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
706e5
906ea
Core
Ice Lake-U
Coffee Lake-H
Base frecuency
1.3 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
BGA1440
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
15 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
9216 kB
Date
August 2019
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
74.82k points
53.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
214.34k points
231.9k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1065G7
i7-8750H
Test#1 (Integers)
28.19k
22.36k (x0.79)
Test#2 (FP)
22.13k
19.33k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.32k
4.4k (x0.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.17k
7.32k (x0.52)
TOTAL
74.82k
53.41k (x0.71)
Multithread
i7-1065G7
i7-8750H
Test#1 (Integers)
86.39k
103.82k (x1.2)
Test#2 (FP)
86.22k
100.47k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.99k
23.81k (x0.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.75k
3.8k (x0.43)
TOTAL
214.34k
231.9k (x1.08)
Performance/W
i7-1065G7
i7-8750H
Test#1 (Integers)
5759 points/W
2307 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5748 points/W
2233 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2199 points/W
529 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
583 points/W
84 points/W
TOTAL
14289 points/W
5153 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-1065G7
i7-8750H
Test#1 (Integers)
7229 points/GHz
5454 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5675 points/GHz
4714 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2646 points/GHz
1073 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3634 points/GHz
1786 points/GHz
TOTAL
19184 points/GHz
13027 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4