| | | | | | |

Core i7-1065G7 vs i7-10870H


Description
The i7-1065G7 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the i7-10870H is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1065G7 gets a score of 214.3 k points while the i7-10870H gets 487 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-10870H is 2.3 times faster than the i7-1065G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706e5
a0652
Core
Ice Lake-U
Comet Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.3 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
FC-BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
15 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
16384 kB
Date
August 2019
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
74.82k points
79.2k points
Mean multithread perf.
214.34k points
487.05k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1065G7
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
28.19k
30.38k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
22.13k
27.95k (x1.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.32k
6.51k (x0.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.17k
14.37k (x1.01)
TOTAL
74.82k
79.2k (x1.06)

Multithread

i7-1065G7

i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
86.39k
216.18k (x2.5)
Test#2 (FP)
86.22k
210.82k (x2.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.99k
51.57k (x1.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.75k
8.47k (x0.97)
TOTAL
214.34k
487.05k (x2.27)

Performance/W
i7-1065G7
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
5759 points/W
4804 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5748 points/W
4685 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2199 points/W
1146 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
583 points/W
188 points/W
TOTAL
14289 points/W
10823 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-1065G7
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
7229 points/GHz
6075 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5675 points/GHz
5589 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2646 points/GHz
1302 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3634 points/GHz
2873 points/GHz
TOTAL
19184 points/GHz
15840 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4