| | | | | | |

Core i7-1065G7 vs i5-8365U


Description
The i7-1065G7 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the i5-8365U is based on Whiskey Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1065G7 gets a score of 214.3 k points while the i5-8365U gets 197.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-1065G7 is 1.1 times faster than the i5-8365U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706e5
806ec
Core
Ice Lake-U
Whiskey Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.3 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
August 2019
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
74.82k points
59.73k points
Mean multithread perf.
214.34k points
197.46k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1065G7
i5-8365U
Test#1 (Integers)
28.19k
24.37k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
22.13k
22.68k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.32k
4.98k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.17k
7.7k (x0.54)
TOTAL
74.82k
59.73k (x0.8)

Multithread

i7-1065G7

i5-8365U
Test#1 (Integers)
86.39k
89.45k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
86.22k
85.57k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.99k
19.02k (x0.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.75k
3.41k (x0.39)
TOTAL
214.34k
197.46k (x0.92)

Performance/W
i7-1065G7
i5-8365U
Test#1 (Integers)
5759 points/W
5964 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5748 points/W
5705 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2199 points/W
1268 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
583 points/W
227 points/W
TOTAL
14289 points/W
13164 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-1065G7
i5-8365U
Test#1 (Integers)
7229 points/GHz
5944 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5675 points/GHz
5531 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2646 points/GHz
1214 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3634 points/GHz
1879 points/GHz
TOTAL
19184 points/GHz
14568 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4