| | | | | | |

Core i7-1065G7 vs i5-8265U


Description
The i7-1065G7 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the i5-8265U is based on Whiskey Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1065G7 gets a score of 214.3 k points while the i5-8265U gets 143.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-1065G7 is 1.5 times faster than the i5-8265U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706e5
806ec
Core
Ice Lake-U
Whiskey Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.3 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
BGA1528
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
August 2019
August 2018
Mean monothread perf.
74.82k points
46.67k points
Mean multithread perf.
214.34k points
143.23k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1065G7
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
28.19k
19.19k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
22.13k
17.47k (x0.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.32k
4.04k (x0.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.17k
5.97k (x0.42)
TOTAL
74.82k
46.67k (x0.62)

Multithread

i7-1065G7

i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
86.39k
64.43k (x0.75)
Test#2 (FP)
86.22k
61.91k (x0.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.99k
13.36k (x0.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.75k
3.52k (x0.4)
TOTAL
214.34k
143.23k (x0.67)

Performance/W
i7-1065G7
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
5759 points/W
4296 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5748 points/W
4128 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2199 points/W
890 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
583 points/W
235 points/W
TOTAL
14289 points/W
9548 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-1065G7
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
7229 points/GHz
4920 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5675 points/GHz
4478 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2646 points/GHz
1037 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3634 points/GHz
1531 points/GHz
TOTAL
19184 points/GHz
11966 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4