| | | | | | |

Core i7-1065G7 vs i5-10500T


Description
The i7-1065G7 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the i5-10500T is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1065G7 gets a score of 214.3 k points while the i5-10500T gets 302.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10500T is 1.4 times faster than the i7-1065G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706e5
a0653
Core
Ice Lake-U
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.3 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
12288 kB
Date
August 2019
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
74.82k points
64.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
214.34k points
302.13k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1065G7
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
28.19k
25.16k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
22.13k
22.28k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.32k
5.18k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.17k
11.97k (x0.84)
TOTAL
74.82k
64.6k (x0.86)

Multithread

i7-1065G7

i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
86.39k
144.86k (x1.68)
Test#2 (FP)
86.22k
120.98k (x1.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.99k
32.55k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.75k
3.73k (x0.43)
TOTAL
214.34k
302.13k (x1.41)

Performance/W
i7-1065G7
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
5759 points/W
4139 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5748 points/W
3457 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2199 points/W
930 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
583 points/W
107 points/W
TOTAL
14289 points/W
8632 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-1065G7
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
7229 points/GHz
6621 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5675 points/GHz
5863 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2646 points/GHz
1364 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3634 points/GHz
3151 points/GHz
TOTAL
19184 points/GHz
16999 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4