Core i7-1065G7 vs i5-10400F
Description
The i7-1065G7 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the i5-10400F is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1065G7 gets a score of 214.3 k points while the i5-10400F gets 390.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400F is 1.8 times faster than the i7-1065G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1065G7 gets a score of 214.3 k points while the i5-10400F gets 390.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400F is 1.8 times faster than the i7-1065G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
706e5
a0655
Core
Ice Lake-U
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
1.3 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
16386 kB
Date
August 2019
May 2020
Mean monothread perf.
74.82k points
72.25k points
Mean multithread perf.
214.34k points
390.78k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1065G7
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
28.19k
28.39k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
22.13k
24.89k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.32k
5.78k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.17k
13.19k (x0.93)
TOTAL
74.82k
72.25k (x0.97)
Multithread
i7-1065G7
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
86.39k
180.2k (x2.09)
Test#2 (FP)
86.22k
163.51k (x1.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.99k
40.6k (x1.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.75k
6.48k (x0.74)
TOTAL
214.34k
390.78k (x1.82)
Performance/W
i7-1065G7
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
5759 points/W
2772 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5748 points/W
2515 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2199 points/W
625 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
583 points/W
100 points/W
TOTAL
14289 points/W
6012 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-1065G7
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
7229 points/GHz
6603 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5675 points/GHz
5788 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2646 points/GHz
1344 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3634 points/GHz
3067 points/GHz
TOTAL
19184 points/GHz
16803 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4