| | | | | | |

Core i7-1065G7 vs i3-6100


Description
The i7-1065G7 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the i3-6100 is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1065G7 gets a score of 214.3 k points while the i3-6100 gets 112.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-1065G7 is 1.9 times faster than the i3-6100 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706e5
506e3
Core
Ice Lake-U
Skylake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.3 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/2
TDP
15 W
51 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
August 2019
September 2015
Mean monothread perf.
74.82k points
52.84k points
Mean multithread perf.
214.34k points
112.28k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1065G7
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
28.19k
22.89k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
22.13k
21.04k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.32k
4.9k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.17k
4.01k (x0.28)
TOTAL
74.82k
52.84k (x0.71)

Multithread

i7-1065G7

i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
86.39k
50.05k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
86.22k
47.13k (x0.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.99k
11.38k (x0.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.75k
3.72k (x0.42)
TOTAL
214.34k
112.28k (x0.52)

Performance/W
i7-1065G7
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
5759 points/W
981 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5748 points/W
924 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2199 points/W
223 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
583 points/W
73 points/W
TOTAL
14289 points/W
2202 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-1065G7
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
7229 points/GHz
6187 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5675 points/GHz
5686 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2646 points/GHz
1325 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3634 points/GHz
1084 points/GHz
TOTAL
19184 points/GHz
14282 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4