Core i7-1065G7 vs Ryzen 9 3900
Description
The i7-1065G7 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the 3900 is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1065G7 gets a score of 214.3 k points while the 3900 gets 687.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 3900 is 3.2 times faster than the i7-1065G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1065G7 gets a score of 214.3 k points while the 3900 gets 687.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 3900 is 3.2 times faster than the i7-1065G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
706e5
870f10
Core
Ice Lake-U
Matisse
Base frecuency
1.3 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
12/24
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
12x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4x16384 kB
Date
August 2019
September 2019
Mean monothread perf.
74.82k points
74.97k points
Mean multithread perf.
214.34k points
687.5k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1065G7
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
28.19k
16.85k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
22.13k
26.03k (x1.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.32k
9.54k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.17k
22.55k (x1.59)
TOTAL
74.82k
74.97k (x1)
Multithread
i7-1065G7
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
86.39k
229.41k (x2.66)
Test#2 (FP)
86.22k
292.81k (x3.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.99k
128.48k (x3.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.75k
36.8k (x4.21)
TOTAL
214.34k
687.5k (x3.21)
Performance/W
i7-1065G7
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
5759 points/W
3529 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5748 points/W
4505 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2199 points/W
1977 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
583 points/W
566 points/W
TOTAL
14289 points/W
10577 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-1065G7
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
7229 points/GHz
3920 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5675 points/GHz
6054 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2646 points/GHz
2218 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3634 points/GHz
5243 points/GHz
TOTAL
19184 points/GHz
17435 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4