| | | | | | |

Core i7-1065G7 vs Ryzen 5 5600G


Description
The i7-1065G7 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the 5600G is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1065G7 gets a score of 214.3 k points while the 5600G gets 345.6 k points.

Summarizing, the 5600G is 1.6 times faster than the i7-1065G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706e5
a50f00
Core
Ice Lake-U
Cezanne
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.3 GHz
3.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
16384 kB
Date
August 2019
April 2021
Mean monothread perf.
74.82k points
79.76k points
Mean multithread perf.
214.34k points
345.64k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1065G7
5600G
Test#1 (Integers)
28.19k
22.16k (x0.79)
Test#2 (FP)
22.13k
24.46k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.32k
10.71k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.17k
22.44k (x1.58)
TOTAL
74.82k
79.76k (x1.07)

Multithread

i7-1065G7

5600G
Test#1 (Integers)
86.39k
112.5k (x1.3)
Test#2 (FP)
86.22k
153.92k (x1.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.99k
67.75k (x2.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.75k
11.47k (x1.31)
TOTAL
214.34k
345.64k (x1.61)

Performance/W
i7-1065G7
5600G
Test#1 (Integers)
5759 points/W
1731 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5748 points/W
2368 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2199 points/W
1042 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
583 points/W
177 points/W
TOTAL
14289 points/W
5318 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-1065G7
5600G
Test#1 (Integers)
7229 points/GHz
5036 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5675 points/GHz
5558 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2646 points/GHz
2434 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3634 points/GHz
5099 points/GHz
TOTAL
19184 points/GHz
18128 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4