| | | | | | |

Core i7-1065G7 vs Ryzen 5 3550H


Description
The i7-1065G7 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the 3550H is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1065G7 gets a score of 214.3 k points while the 3550H gets 178.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-1065G7 is 1.2 times faster than the 3550H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706e5
810f81
Core
Ice Lake-U
Picasso
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.3 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
August 2019
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
74.82k points
45.07k points
Mean multithread perf.
214.34k points
178.26k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1065G7
3550H
Test#1 (Integers)
28.19k
13.51k (x0.48)
Test#2 (FP)
22.13k
22.34k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.32k
4.98k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.17k
4.24k (x0.3)
TOTAL
74.82k
45.07k (x0.6)

Multithread

i7-1065G7

3550H
Test#1 (Integers)
86.39k
52.21k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
86.22k
95.66k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.99k
25.54k (x0.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.75k
4.85k (x0.55)
TOTAL
214.34k
178.26k (x0.83)

Performance/W
i7-1065G7
3550H
Test#1 (Integers)
5759 points/W
1492 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5748 points/W
2733 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2199 points/W
730 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
583 points/W
139 points/W
TOTAL
14289 points/W
5093 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-1065G7
3550H
Test#1 (Integers)
7229 points/GHz
3652 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5675 points/GHz
6038 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2646 points/GHz
1347 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3634 points/GHz
1145 points/GHz
TOTAL
19184 points/GHz
12182 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4