| | | | | | |

Core i7-1065G7 vs Ryzen 3 3200G


Description
The i7-1065G7 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the 3200G is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1065G7 gets a score of 214.3 k points while the 3200G gets 168.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-1065G7 is 1.3 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706e5
810f81
Core
Ice Lake-U
Picasso
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
August 2019
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
74.82k points
49.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
214.34k points
168.69k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1065G7
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
28.19k
14.48k (x0.51)
Test#2 (FP)
22.13k
23.84k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.32k
5.43k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.17k
5.46k (x0.39)
TOTAL
74.82k
49.21k (x0.66)

Multithread

i7-1065G7

3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
86.39k
54.39k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
86.22k
88.77k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.99k
20.04k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.75k
5.48k (x0.63)
TOTAL
214.34k
168.69k (x0.79)

Performance/W
i7-1065G7
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
5759 points/W
837 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5748 points/W
1366 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2199 points/W
308 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
583 points/W
84 points/W
TOTAL
14289 points/W
2595 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-1065G7
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
7229 points/GHz
3619 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5675 points/GHz
5961 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2646 points/GHz
1357 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3634 points/GHz
1365 points/GHz
TOTAL
19184 points/GHz
12302 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4